The Law and the PS3 Apocalypse
> Editorial Comments > SPOnG Comments Index
Topic started: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 20:26
Click here to view the editorial this topic refers to.
Click here to view the editorial this topic refers to.
Wed, 3 Mar 2010 09:09
haritori wrote:
* PS3 owners who hadn't bought extended warranty protection would kick themselves mightily
The is wouldn't matter as it affected every single PS3 (fat) version it would of been deemed at fault at production and as such been covered (in the UK) up to 7 years from sale date.
The is wouldn't matter as it affected every single PS3 (fat) version it would of been deemed at fault at production and as such been covered (in the UK) up to 7 years from sale date.
Did you read the article, you know the one by the actual lawyer, not the psychologist commenter. He specifically said six years, but it depends on proving a lt to the retailer. In that case, you'd be better off with an extended warranty cos no questions asked.
Wed, 3 Mar 2010 18:37
When I phoned sony they took liability soon as I phoned and these calls are recorded so they would have to replace it with warrenty or without
Sat, 13 Mar 2010 03:12
Good thing I have the slim, whoo.
Log-in or register to permanently change your layout setting.
2320 comments
The is wouldn't matter as it affected every single PS3 (fat) version it would of been deemed at fault at production and as such been covered (in the UK) up to 7 years from sale date.